Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Maryland DUI Lawyers Baltimore Driving Influence Drugs

Have you been charged with DUI in the State of Maryland?


Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with DUI in the state of Maryland?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court alone if you have been charged with a crime of DUI in the state of Maryland.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense of DUI in the state of Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) and Baltimore.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Chester v. State

Facts:

Defendant sought review of the judgments from the Circuit Court for Baltimore (Maryland), which convicted him of driving while under the influence (DUI) of drugs in contravention of Md. Ann. Code art. 66 1/2, § 11-902(a), and possession of barbiturates.

If you are facing a traffic case in the State of Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747.

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:

  • An appellate court cannot be precluded from determining whether the circumstances under which a confession is made were such that its admission in evidence amounts to a denial of due process. What is meant by the obligation to make an independent, reflective constitutional judgment on the facts whenever a claim of a constitutionally-protected right is involved is that, although the appellate court gives great weight to the findings of the hearing judge as to specific, first-level facts (such as the time that an interrogation began, whether a meal was or was not served, whether a telephone call was requested, etc.), the appellate court must make its own independent judgment as to what to make of those facts; the appellate court must, in making that independent judgment, resolve for itself the ultimate, second-level fact -- the existence or non-existence of a bona fide inventory.
  • An essential requirement to a valid inventory search is that the police must have acted in good faith in conducting the inventory, and must not have used the inventory procedure as a subterfuge for a warrantless search. Where the conduct of the police was inconsistent with its contention that the search was conducted for inventory purposes, the search was unlawful.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense of DUI in the state of Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) and Baltimore.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #

Maryland

Rockville 240-399-0304
Baltimore 240-399-0304

Social Icons

Copyright © 2012 Maryland Lawyer Attorneys. | All Rights Reserved.. Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts